Until now, the NCA has assumed that joint tenders between undertakings that are individually able to carry out the project alone, will normally have the purpose of restricting competition in the sense of the Norwegian Competition Act (“the Competition Act”).

The topic of consideration as to whether the cooperation is affected by the prohibition on anticompetitive cooperation in Section 10, first paragraph, of the Competition Act has primarily focused on whether the undertakings – without the cooperation – would have had a genuine opportunity to submit separate bids for the project. The assessment of whether the undertakings have had a genuine opportunity to carry out the project individually has relied on a strict, concrete and objective assessment that has resulted in a very restrictive approach to tender cooperation.

Furthermore, the NCA’s assessment of whether the project cooperation will result in socio-economic efficiency gains that offset the anticompetitive effects of the cooperation and the possibility of exemption provided for in Section 10, third paragraph, of the Competition Act, has been very narrow. This has led to a high level of uncertainty and frustration among undertakings wishing to take part in commercially desirable cooperation constellations and consortium agreements with clear efficiency gains to the benefit of the contracting entity, suppliers and consumers.

Changes to the European Commission´s guidelines

), the European Commission has addressed the framework for lawful tender and project cooperation. Section 10, first paragraph of the Competition Act prohibits cooperation between undertakings whose purpose or effect is to restrict competition. The prohibition means that, as a general rule, 

 are not allowed tocooperate on submitting a joint bid in a tender competition.

The basis of the assessment under the new guidelines is still whether the companies are able to submit bids separately. In its concrete and objective assessment of whether the undertakings are able to submit separate bids, the NCA will typically place emphasis on the undertakings’ resources in relation to the nature and size of the project. In addition to the companies’ actual and potential resources at the time of performance, the new guidelines allow for considerations such as financial and commercial risk (including investment needs) to be relevant. Consequently, a theoretical possibility of submitting separate bids is not sufficient to regard the undertakings as competitors. A realistic assessment must be made of whether the company would actually have carried out the specific project on its own.

Much needed relaxation of the possibility of entering into cooperation

Despite the companies being able to submit bids individually, the guidelines now clearly state that if the cooperation entails substantiable efficiency gains for the contracting entity that one of the suppliers is unable to achieve alone, including a lower price, better quality/selection and/or more efficient project implementation, the cooperation will be lawful pursuant to the exclusionary provision in Section 10, third paragraph, of the Competition Act (the efficiency defence). This lowers the high threshold that has been applied by the NCA for assessing when a project cooperation can produce efficiency gains that exceed the negative effects of the cooperation.

The new Horizontal Guidelines will form the basis for the NCA’s interpretation of Section 10 of the Competition Act and provide a much-needed relaxation of the possibility of taking part in tender and project cooperations in the face of strong competition from larger undertakings. There will be greater scope for cooperation between competitors on joint bids for projects and in the context of tender processes.

The European Commission’s new Horizontal Guidelines – Clarification of the boundaries for tender and project cooperation

The aim of the guide is to provide its readers with a pragmatic overview of the laws and regulations of Public Procurement practice across a variety of jurisdictions. Each chapter of this guide provides information about government contracting laws, complex contracts, the evaluation of bids and common challenges.

: Espen I. Bakken, Frida May Behrens and Kristine Farestvedt Nesse


Contribution to Legal 500’s publication «Public Procurement 2020»

Some of the issues discussed in the chapter are the procurement procedures used in Norway, and what requirements the contracting authority can make to tenderers for participation in the competitions. Furthermore, the chapter discusses what requirements the regulations set for the contracting authority’s implementation of competitions and how tenderers can pursue the contracting authority's conduct of competitions.

To read the Norwegian chapter, please click 

: Espen I. Bakken, Frida May Behrens, Kristine Farestvedt Nesse


: "Public Procurement and Government Contracts 2020"


Contribution to "Public Procurement and Government Contracts 2020"

Svein Terje Tveit

Gro Amdal

Jon Gresseth

Our task is to identify and manage risk on the client and supplier side in tender competitions and framework agreements. We assist clients in all industries and sectors, and in all phases associated with procurement. From the planning phase to the implementation phase and contract phase. We offer advice in relation to the following:

risk assessment prior to tender competitions/bids

drafting of invitations to tender / tender bids

We work closely with specialists from other fields and industries in our firm, such as EU and EEA law, capital markets, dispute resolution and litigation, and construction law, to ensure that our clients are designated the most optimum team for each assignment.

Public procurement law

Advice from our lawyers

What you can expect from us

News

The European Commission’s new Horizontal Guidelines – Clarification of the boundaries for tender and project cooperation

Contribution to Legal 500’s publication «Public Procurement 2020»

Contribution to "Public Procurement and Government Contracts 2020"

Nyhetsbrev